From sobomax at sippysoft.com  Fri Feb  6 00:16:05 2009
From: sobomax at sippysoft.com (Maxim Sobolev)
Date: Fri,  6 Feb 2009 09:16:05 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [RTPproxy Devel] CVS:commitlog: rtpproxy/rpm rtpproxy.spec
Message-ID: <20090206081605.24C7811B391@mail.berlios.de>

sobomax     2009/02/06 09:16:04 CET

  SER CVS Repository

  Modified files:
    rpm                  rtpproxy.spec 
  Log:
  Update to match 1.2 beta.
  
  Submitted by:   Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh at db.org>
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.2       +9 -6      rtpproxy/rpm/rtpproxy.spec
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/rtpproxy/rpm/rtpproxy.spec.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2

From sourav.chakraborty at rebaca.com  Wed Feb 11 02:41:00 2009
From: sourav.chakraborty at rebaca.com (Sourav Chakraborty)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:11:00 +0530
Subject: [RTPproxy Devel] SER+RTPProxy configuration and usage
Message-ID: <004b01c98c35$3c9828d0$0b32a8c0@godavori31>

Hello,
We are using SER and RTPProxy together.
1>We need to understand the architecture of RTPProxy i.e whether it opens up one process per transaction or not,etc.
2>We also need to know whether we can club RTPProxy with CDRTool to generate billing records and 
3>Also whether the idle call detection is handled by SER or not(sending BYE to both parties).
Please answer our questions asap.

Rgds
Sourav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090211/e0607b0d/attachment.html 

From sobomax at sippysoft.com  Wed Feb 11 21:02:07 2009
From: sobomax at sippysoft.com (Maxim Sobolev)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:02:07 -0800
Subject: [RTPproxy Devel] SER+RTPProxy configuration and usage
In-Reply-To: <004b01c98c35$3c9828d0$0b32a8c0@godavori31>
References: <004b01c98c35$3c9828d0$0b32a8c0@godavori31>
Message-ID: <4993AD4F.1030401@sippysoft.com>

Sourav Chakraborty wrote:
> Hello,
> We are using SER and RTPProxy together.
> 1>We need to understand the architecture of RTPProxy i.e whether 
> it opens up one process per transaction or not,etc.

No, it uses single process for all RTP sessions.

> 2>We also need to know whether we can club RTPProxy with CDRTool to 
> generate billing records and

The RTPproxy is not intended for this. You can use B2BUA, 
http://www.b2bua.org, to generate accurate accounting for SIP calls.

> 3>Also whether the idle call detection is handled by SER or not(sending 
> BYE to both parties).

SER is not dialog stateful, so that it cannot generate BYE. You should 
be using B2BUA for that. We are working on the new version of b2bua here 
that can do that when signaled by the RTPproxy on session timeout, we 
plan to make it available within 1-2 weeks.

> Please answer our questions asap.

Regards,
-- 
Maksym Sobolyev
Sippy Software, Inc.
Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts
T/F: +1-646-651-1110
Web: http://www.sippysoft.com
MSN: sales at sippysoft.com
Skype: SippySoft

From Taras.Kostyuk at landkom.com  Wed Feb 25 22:35:54 2009
From: Taras.Kostyuk at landkom.com (Taras Kostyuk)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:35:54 -0000
Subject: [RTPproxy Devel] bug in ./rpm/rtpproxy.spec
Message-ID: <5D924FB5893BED4AAB2E3821EDC28D4B092C7F@lvpromdc03.lkukraine.com>

Hi,

 

I found the bug in file ./rpm/rtpproxy.spec

 

The last five strings in ./rpm/rtpproxy.spec are:

 

* Mon Jan 12 2009 Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh at db.org>

- Updated for version 1.2

 

%changelog

* Tue Jan 30 2007 Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh at db.org> - 0.3.1

- Initial build.

 

With these strings rpmbuild ends with error

 

I replaced the order of these strings as:

 

%changelog

* Mon Jan 12 2009 Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh at db.org>

- Updated for version 1.2

 

* Tue Jan 30 2007 Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh at db.org> - 0.3.1

- Initial build.

 

and rpmbuild finished without errors

 

 

Taras Kostyuk

LK Ukraine Group

System Administrator

cel: +38 067 673-14-78

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090226/9c11caf0/attachment.html