From thomas.elsgaard at gmail.com Mon Sep 1 07:18:12 2008 From: thomas.elsgaard at gmail.com (Thomas Elsgaard) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 16:18:12 +0200 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] rtpproxy and RAW format Message-ID: Hi Guys Can rtpproxy dump the streams to the RAW format, the same as used in wirehark, when you are saving a stream? ///Thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080901/04893496/attachment.html From osas at voipembedded.com Mon Sep 1 07:25:56 2008 From: osas at voipembedded.com (Ovidiu Sas) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:25:56 -0400 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] rtpproxy and RAW format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6f497e130809010725l173e58b4tb1a2054a22b8fa68@mail.gmail.com> AFAIR this feature will be available in the next release. You can test it by using the trunk version of rtpproxy. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Elsgaard wrote: > Hi Guys > > Can rtpproxy dump the streams to the RAW format, the same as used in > wirehark, when you are saving a stream? > > ///Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users at rtpproxy.org > http://lists.rtpproxy.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > From thomas.elsgaard at gmail.com Mon Sep 1 10:08:40 2008 From: thomas.elsgaard at gmail.com (Thomas Elsgaard) Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:08:40 +0200 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] rtpproxy and RAW format -SOLVED- In-Reply-To: <6f497e130809010725l173e58b4tb1a2054a22b8fa68@mail.gmail.com> References: <6f497e130809010725l173e58b4tb1a2054a22b8fa68@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48BC2198.4040308@gmail.com> Ovidiu Sas wrote: > AFAIR this feature will be available in the next release. > You can test it by using the trunk version of rtpproxy. > > > Regards, > Ovidiu Sas > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Elsgaard > wrote: > >> Hi Guys >> >> Can rtpproxy dump the streams to the RAW format, the same as used in >> wirehark, when you are saving a stream? >> >> ///Thomas >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users at rtpproxy.org >> http://lists.rtpproxy.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users at rtpproxy.org > http://lists.rtpproxy.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > Hi Ovidiu Yes, i just checked with the 1.2 version, and by adding the -P flag, it can dump to the libpcap format Thanks ///Thomas From thomas.elsgaard at gmail.com Tue Sep 2 00:35:12 2008 From: thomas.elsgaard at gmail.com (Thomas Elsgaard) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:35:12 +0200 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] Release date for rtpproxy 1.2? Message-ID: Hi Guys Does anybody know the release date for rtpproxy version 1.2? maybe not the exact date, but as close as possible ///Thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080902/2dbed2fa/attachment.html From sobomax at sippysoft.com Thu Sep 4 21:28:19 2008 From: sobomax at sippysoft.com (Maxim Sobolev) Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:28:19 -0700 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] rtpproxy and RAW format In-Reply-To: <6f497e130809010725l173e58b4tb1a2054a22b8fa68@mail.gmail.com> References: <6f497e130809010725l173e58b4tb1a2054a22b8fa68@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48C0B563.8080806@sippysoft.com> Ovidiu Sas wrote: > AFAIR this feature will be available in the next release. > You can test it by using the trunk version of rtpproxy. > > > Regards, > Ovidiu Sas > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Elsgaard > wrote: >> Hi Guys >> >> Can rtpproxy dump the streams to the RAW format, the same as used in >> wirehark, when you are saving a stream? Yes, indeed. With the trunk version of the rtpproxy you can use -P option to request the wireshark-compatible dump format instead of ad-hoc raw format. Please see the following change for details: http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/rtpproxy/main.c?rev=1.79&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com From sobomax at sippysoft.com Thu Sep 4 21:32:52 2008 From: sobomax at sippysoft.com (Maxim Sobolev) Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:32:52 -0700 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] Release date for rtpproxy 1.2? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48C0B674.6040301@sippysoft.com> Thomas Elsgaard wrote: > Hi Guys > > Does anybody know the release date for rtpproxy version 1.2? maybe not > the exact date, but as close as possible Dear Thomas, I hope to get it released within 1 month from now. We still need to find time to finish few half-finished features and update the documentation. Any help from you or anybody else on this list is greatly appreciated. Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com From thomas.elsgaard at gmail.com Tue Sep 9 01:59:37 2008 From: thomas.elsgaard at gmail.com (Thomas Elsgaard) Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:59:37 +0200 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] Release date for rtpproxy 1.2? In-Reply-To: <48C0B674.6040301@sippysoft.com> References: <48C0B674.6040301@sippysoft.com> Message-ID: <48C63AF9.8020600@gmail.com> Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Thomas Elsgaard wrote: > >> Hi Guys >> >> Does anybody know the release date for rtpproxy version 1.2? maybe not >> the exact date, but as close as possible >> > > Dear Thomas, > > I hope to get it released within 1 month from now. We still need to find > time to finish few half-finished features and update the documentation. > Any help from you or anybody else on this list is greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > Hi Maxim Thanks for the answer, another question that you maybe can help me with: will the libpcap functionality be available in the commercially supported version? If yes, any ideas about when? best regards ///Thomas From sobomax at sippysoft.com Tue Sep 16 14:31:26 2008 From: sobomax at sippysoft.com (Maxim Sobolev) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:31:26 -0700 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] Release date for rtpproxy 1.2? In-Reply-To: <48C63AF9.8020600@gmail.com> References: <48C0B674.6040301@sippysoft.com> <48C63AF9.8020600@gmail.com> Message-ID: <48D025AE.1060501@sippysoft.com> Thomas Elsgaard wrote: > Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> Thomas Elsgaard wrote: >> >>> Hi Guys >>> >>> Does anybody know the release date for rtpproxy version 1.2? maybe not >>> the exact date, but as close as possible >>> >> Dear Thomas, >> >> I hope to get it released within 1 month from now. We still need to find >> time to finish few half-finished features and update the documentation. >> Any help from you or anybody else on this list is greatly appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> > Hi Maxim > > Thanks for the answer, another question that you maybe can help me with: > will the libpcap functionality be available in the commercially > supported version? If yes, any ideas about when? Thomas, We can provide commercial support for 1.2beta (version that has libpcap compatible output) if needed. Please contact sales at sippysoft.com for details. Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com From xserverlinux at gmail.com Sun Sep 21 10:41:03 2008 From: xserverlinux at gmail.com (troxlinux) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:41:03 -0600 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] rtpproxy 1.1 error Message-ID: hi list, I am trying to make work rtpproxy with kamailio 1.4, but I see some strange messages in the kamailio log Sep 21 11:38:01 xserver /sbin/kamailio[5406]: ERROR:nathelper:extract_body: message body has length zero Sep 21 11:38:01 xserver /sbin/kamailio[5406]: ERROR:nathelper:force_rtp_proxy2_f: can't extract body from the message some idea where it can be the problem? regards rickygm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080921/30ceb0f9/attachment.html From sobomax at sippysoft.com Sun Sep 21 11:19:23 2008 From: sobomax at sippysoft.com (Maxim Sobolev) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:19:23 -0700 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] rtpproxy 1.1 error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <48D6902B.1050900@sippysoft.com> troxlinux wrote: > hi list, I am trying to make work rtpproxy with kamailio 1.4, but I see > some strange messages in the kamailio log > > Sep 21 11:38:01 xserver /sbin/kamailio[5406]: > ERROR:nathelper:extract_body: message body has length zero > Sep 21 11:38:01 xserver /sbin/kamailio[5406]: > ERROR:nathelper:force_rtp_proxy2_f: can't extract body from the message > > some idea where it can be the problem? You are probably invoking force_rtp_proxy on SIP message that has no SDP body, such as ACK, CANCEL or BYE. Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com From xserverlinux at gmail.com Mon Sep 22 22:58:23 2008 From: xserverlinux at gmail.com (troxlinux) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:58:23 -0600 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] rtpproxy 1.1 error In-Reply-To: <48D6902B.1050900@sippysoft.com> References: <48D6902B.1050900@sippysoft.com> Message-ID: Hi Maxim .. I am using inside this route: route[6] { if (is_method("BYE|CANCEL")) { unforce_rtp_proxy(); } else if (is_method("INVITE")){ force_rtp_proxy(); t_on_failure("3"); }; if (isflagset(5)) search_append('Contact:.*sip:[^>[:cntrl:]]*', ';nat=yes'); t_on_reply("1"); } I am new with rtpproxy, and I am following this guide: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/OpenSER+v1.2.x+and+RTPProxy as could add it? blessings rickygm 2008/9/21 Maxim Sobolev > > You are probably invoking force_rtp_proxy on SIP message that has no SDP > body, such as ACK, CANCEL or BYE. > > Regards, > -- > Maksym Sobolyev > Sippy Software, Inc. > Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts > T/F: +1-646-651-1110 > Web: http://www.sippysoft.com > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users at rtpproxy.org > http://lists.rtpproxy.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080922/5daef993/attachment.html From jinline.adsl at msa.hinet.net Thu Sep 25 00:30:28 2008 From: jinline.adsl at msa.hinet.net (Cheng-Lin Tsai) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:30:28 +0800 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] stress test for rtpproxy Message-ID: <000f01c91ee0$95a2c5b0$8c3b0a0a@jinlinepc> Hello All: I have a question about rtpproxy max rtp streams, It's a stress test for rtpproxy, I want to send many rtp streams to rtpproxy in the same time, can I only generate rtp packets streams and send to rtpproxy, and record any packet loss or not? I don't consider SER , OPENSER or any SIP message,only handle the part of RTP streams. any suggestion, thanks. regards, chenglin Sep 25 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080925/38276dde/attachment.html From clona at cyberhouse.no Sun Sep 21 10:59:52 2008 From: clona at cyberhouse.no (Atle Samuelsen) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:59:52 +0200 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] rtpproxy 1.1 error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20080921175952.GC63335@mystic.cyberhouse.no> Hi Rickygm, The error you see here is if you call force_rtp_proxy() on a mesasge containing no SDP. If you google this error message you will find the error spread all over the google-space. Best Regards Atle * troxlinux [080921 19:49]: > hi list, I am trying to make work rtpproxy with kamailio 1.4, but I see some > strange messages in the kamailio log > > Sep 21 11:38:01 xserver /sbin/kamailio[5406]: ERROR:nathelper:extract_body: > message body has length zero > Sep 21 11:38:01 xserver /sbin/kamailio[5406]: > ERROR:nathelper:force_rtp_proxy2_f: can't extract body from the message > > some idea where it can be the problem? > > regards > > rickygm > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users at rtpproxy.org > http://lists.rtpproxy.org/mailman/listinfo/users From xserverlinux at gmail.com Sun Sep 28 11:49:25 2008 From: xserverlinux at gmail.com (troxlinux) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:49:25 -0600 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] rtpproxy 1.1 error In-Reply-To: <20080921175952.GC63335@mystic.cyberhouse.no> References: <20080921175952.GC63335@mystic.cyberhouse.no> Message-ID: Ok thank, already fix the problem inside onreply_route{1] best regards.. rickygm 2008/9/21 Atle Samuelsen > Hi Rickygm, > > The error you see here is if you call force_rtp_proxy() on a mesasge > containing no SDP. > > If you google this error message you will find the error spread all over > the google-space. > > Best Regards > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080928/645c62d1/attachment.html From xserverlinux at gmail.com Sun Sep 28 21:41:05 2008 From: xserverlinux at gmail.com (troxlinux) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:41:05 -0600 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] interpretation of this error message Message-ID: as I can solve this error message? ERROR:nathelper:force_rtp_proxy2_f: incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy greetings rickygm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080928/83ff0e0d/attachment.html