From klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at Wed Nov 4 07:22:20 2009 From: klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at (Klaus Darilion) Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:22:20 +0100 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] correct meaning of force_rtp_proxy "E" and "I" flags in bridge mode Message-ID: <4AF19C2C.7010800@pernau.at> Hi! When rtpproxy is in bridging mode, and the session is created (INVITE) with "I" flag (internal), what command should be specified during lookup (200 ok response) to select the other interface? Do I have to use the 'E' flag to select the other interface, or do I have to specify again the 'I' flag and rtpproxy automatically choose the other interface (as it is a lookup)? regards klaus From sobomax at sippysoft.com Wed Nov 18 03:10:49 2009 From: sobomax at sippysoft.com (Maxim Sobolev) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:10:49 -0800 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] correct meaning of force_rtp_proxy "E" and "I" flags in bridge mode In-Reply-To: <4AF19C2C.7010800@pernau.at> References: <4AF19C2C.7010800@pernau.at> Message-ID: <4B03D639.6040504@sippysoft.com> Klaus Darilion wrote: > Hi! > > When rtpproxy is in bridging mode, and the session is created (INVITE) > with "I" flag (internal), what command should be specified during lookup > (200 ok response) to select the other interface? > > Do I have to use the 'E' flag to select the other interface, or do I > have to specify again the 'I' flag and rtpproxy automatically choose the > other interface (as it is a lookup)? Klaus, Sorry for the delay, somehow I missed this message. Basically, the flag indicates the direction in which the current message is going. So for the 200 OK that goes from internal to external it will have to be IE. Please note that this older version of bridging logic is outdated, I have much better version in place in trunk, which doesn't require any flags from the nathelper, but instead uses host in RURI for INVITE and host in 2nd Via in 200 OK to determine a proper media address. Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com MSN: sales at sippysoft.com Skype: SippySoft From sobomax at sippysoft.com Thu Nov 19 04:59:55 2009 From: sobomax at sippysoft.com (Maxim Sobolev) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:59:55 -0800 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] correct meaning of force_rtp_proxy "E" and "I" flags in bridge mode In-Reply-To: <4AF19C2C.7010800@pernau.at> References: <4AF19C2C.7010800@pernau.at> Message-ID: <4B05414B.8000804@sippysoft.com> Klaus Darilion wrote: > Hi! > > When rtpproxy is in bridging mode, and the session is created (INVITE) > with "I" flag (internal), what command should be specified during lookup > (200 ok response) to select the other interface? > > Do I have to use the 'E' flag to select the other interface, or do I > have to specify again the 'I' flag and rtpproxy automatically choose the > other interface (as it is a lookup)? Klaus, Sorry for the delay, somehow I missed this message. Basically, the flag indicates the direction in which the current message is going. So for the 200 OK that goes from internal to external it will have to be IE. Please note that this older version of bridging logic is outdated, I have much better version in place in trunk, which doesn't require any flags from the nathelper, but instead uses host in RURI for INVITE and host in 2nd Via in 200 OK to determine a proper media address. Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com MSN: sales at sippysoft.com Skype: SippySoft From borisusun at gmail.com Fri Nov 20 08:58:58 2009 From: borisusun at gmail.com (Boris Ouretskey) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:58:58 +0200 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] windows port for rtp proxy Message-ID: <5b6932570911200858t22efd64apb4c8f5db1634ad58@mail.gmail.com> Is there windows port for rtp proxy? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20091120/b9d6cc46/attachment.htm From sobomax at sippysoft.com Fri Nov 20 12:19:52 2009 From: sobomax at sippysoft.com (Maxim Sobolev) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:19:52 -0800 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] windows port for rtp proxy In-Reply-To: <5b6932570911200858t22efd64apb4c8f5db1634ad58@mail.gmail.com> References: <5b6932570911200858t22efd64apb4c8f5db1634ad58@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B06F9E8.7080508@sippysoft.com> Boris Ouretskey wrote: > Is there windows port for rtp proxy? No, I am not aware of any. However, it should be relatively easy to do using either Cygwin or MSU. Patches are welcome as usually. You can also consider running it in the virtual machine. Up to a certain amount of traffic it should be sufficient. Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com MSN: sales at sippysoft.com Skype: SippySoft From borisusun at gmail.com Fri Nov 20 14:26:06 2009 From: borisusun at gmail.com (Boris Ouretskey) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:26:06 +0200 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] windows port for rtp proxy In-Reply-To: <4B06F9E8.7080508@sippysoft.com> References: <5b6932570911200858t22efd64apb4c8f5db1634ad58@mail.gmail.com> <4B06F9E8.7080508@sippysoft.com> Message-ID: <5b6932570911201426y6a3b5c7gc395fb4c60f2cea9@mail.gmail.com> I have several constraints, we want to use its functionality "embedded" for ivrworx application, so it should be compiled with msdev. what is MSU BTW? On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Boris Ouretskey wrote: > > Is there windows port for rtp proxy? > > No, I am not aware of any. However, it should be relatively easy to do > using either Cygwin or MSU. Patches are welcome as usually. > > You can also consider running it in the virtual machine. Up to a certain > amount of traffic it should be sufficient. > > Regards, > -- > Maksym Sobolyev > Sippy Software, Inc. > Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts > T/F: +1-646-651-1110 > Web: http://www.sippysoft.com > MSN: sales at sippysoft.com > Skype: SippySoft > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users at rtpproxy.org > http://lists.rtpproxy.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.rtpproxy.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20091121/642de517/attachment.htm From sobomax at sippysoft.com Fri Nov 20 15:34:52 2009 From: sobomax at sippysoft.com (Maxim Sobolev) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:34:52 -0800 Subject: [RTPproxy Users] windows port for rtp proxy In-Reply-To: <5b6932570911201426y6a3b5c7gc395fb4c60f2cea9@mail.gmail.com> References: <5b6932570911200858t22efd64apb4c8f5db1634ad58@mail.gmail.com> <4B06F9E8.7080508@sippysoft.com> <5b6932570911201426y6a3b5c7gc395fb4c60f2cea9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B07279C.5070009@sippysoft.com> Boris Ouretskey wrote: > I have several constraints, > > we want to use its functionality "embedded" for ivrworx > application, so it should be > compiled with msdev. > > what is MSU BTW? Microsoft service for unix (the name might not be entirely correct). AFAIK they have UNIX-like API for porting application over to Windows. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_Services_for_UNIX Regards, -- Maksym Sobolyev Sippy Software, Inc. Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts T/F: +1-646-651-1110 Web: http://www.sippysoft.com MSN: sales at sippysoft.com Skype: SippySoft